Track: AI for Teaching and Learning

Beyond AI: Future Education

The rapid advancement of AI is driving profound transformation in higher education. Yet the emergence of new technologies does not automatically translate into meaningful educational progress or substantive change in learning. We must therefore look beyond what AI can do and engage with a more fundamental set of questions: Beyond AI tools themselves, where should education be headed? What will future classrooms look like? What kinds of teachers will they require, and what forms of learning will define them? How can we move beyond the superficial application of AI tools and ensure that AI is seamlessly integrated into instructional design, supports deep learning, and advances the holistic evolution of the educational ecosystem? These are among the defining questions confronting universities worldwide today.

This year's Competition is themed "Beyond AI: Future Education". "Beyond AI" signifies moving beyond the superficial AI tool usage and passive technological adaptation, and instead exploring how AI can genuinely support meaningful learning, innovative pedagogical design, and the sustained professional development of educators. "Future Education" conveys an ambition that extends beyond technological iteration and upgrading, calling for a re-examination of the value orientation, educational logic, and developmental pathways of higher education in the age of AI. Under the joint initiative of Peking University, Sun Yat-sen University, Fudan University, and Xi'an Jiaotong University, the 3rd Global Digital Intelligence Education Innovation Competition has established the "AI for Teaching and Learning" track. The Competition invites universities and research institutes worldwide to submit AI-enabled educational innovations that have been implemented in authentic educational contexts and whose outcomes can be demonstrably verified.

This track is open to universities and research institutes around the world, with entities, faculty members, and student teams all eligible to participate. Award-winning submissions will be featured at the Beijing Forum (2026) Symposium on Digital and Intelligent Education and disseminated globally through channels such as the DI-IDEA Hub's online platform and curated case publications. Cases that meet the quality standards will, following peer review, be published under an open access CC-BY 4.0 license.

II. Competition Details

This track consists of four competition groups. Participants may choose any one of the groups. All submissions must be based on projects implemented in real-world educational settings. Their progress and evaluation outcomes must be clearly reported. Purely conceptual proposals or demonstrations will not be accepted.

Competition Group I: AI Agent for Education

This group solicits for agent systems that have already been developed or deployed, with a focus on the integrity of technical solutions and the demonstrability of educational outcomes. Eligible systems must have been in stable operation for at least six months and be supported by technical solutions, user engagement data (e.g. the number of active users, usage frequency, and number of courses or application scenarios covered), and user feedback reports. Examples include, but are not limited to: intelligent teaching assistants, instructional support tools, intelligent learning companions, learning analytics and early-warning systems, intelligent assessment systems, subject-specific vertical LLM applications, and AI agents for research.

Competition Group II: AI-Enhanced Teaching Innovation

This group focuses on cases in which university instructors have deeply integrated AI into course instruction, with emphasis on the originality of instructional design and the substantive enhancement of learning outcomes. Each case must have completed at least one full implementation cycle (e.g. a semester or an entire teaching cycle), and include instructional plans, learning outcome data, and reflective analyses of the teaching process. Examples include, but are not limited to: holistic course design with deep AI integration, AI-empowered innovative laboratory teaching design, AI-based personalized and differentiated instruction, AI-enhanced flipped classrooms and blended teaching, AI-driven innovations in assessment, AI-assisted project-based and interdisciplinary teaching, and teaching practices that cultivate AI literacy and critical thinking.

Competition Group III: AI for Faculty Development

This group solicits from universities and other educational institutions for innovative practices aimed at enhancing faculty AI literacy and professional development, emphasizing how AI strengthens teaching competencies and supports systemic innovation. Each case must have completed at least one full implementation cycle, and include training plans, participant feedback, and effectiveness evaluations. Examples include, but are not limited to: faculty training in AI literacy and human-AI collaboration, innovation in faculty training and professional development support systems, construction of data platforms supporting faculty growth, and practices related to AI ethics and the evolving roles of teachers.

Competition Group IV: AI-Enhanced Learning Innovation

This group focuses on student-centric innovations, with a focus on how AI is used to transform individual or collaborative learning approaches, enhance disciplinary learning capabilities, and address learning challenges. Each case must have completed at least one full implementation cycle (e.g. a semester or an entire learning cycle), and include records of the learning process, evidence of learning outcomes, and personal reflective accounts. Examples include, but are not limited to: AI-enabled self-directed and personalized learning, AI-supported collaborative learning and teamwork, AI-assisted academic research and knowledge production, the development of learning strategies and metacognition in AI-rich environments, and the cultivation of critical and creative thinking in the era of digital intelligence.

Group I is intended for teams whose primary achievements lie in AI systems or tools; Group II for teaching teams whose core achievements lie in course and instructional design; Group III for institutions or teams whose core achievements are in faculty development frameworks or training programs; and Group IV for cases that foreground transformative learning. Submissions are open to both individual students and teams. If a case spans multiple groups, applicants should select the one that best reflects their primary contribution. Each case may be submitted to only one group.

III. Eligibility for Participation

DI-IDEA member institutions are invited to participate. Universities and research institutes worldwide are also welcome. Applications may be submitted by entities, faculty members, or students. Each team may include up to five members.

  • Competition Group I (AI Agent for Education): Open to technical teams, teaching teams, joint teams, and individuals.
  • Competition Group II (AI-Enhanced Teaching Innovation): Applicants must have teaching responsibilities; open to individuals and teaching teams.
  • Competition Group III (AI for Faculty Development): Open to entities such as faculty development centers, faculty development project teams, and individuals.
  • Competition Group IV (AI-Enhanced Learning Innovation): Open to undergraduate, master's, and doctoral students; both individual student and joint faculty-student applications are encouraged.
IV. Submissions

Required Materials:

1. Application Form (completed using the official template), including:

  • Background and problem statements: the educational issue or challenge being addressed, and the necessity and feasibility of applying AI.
  • Implementation plans: specific measures, technical solutions or teaching/learning design, procedures, resources used, and timeline.
  • Innovative highlights: distinctive and original features compared with similar practices.
  • Outcomes and impact: data of implementation results, user feedback, or third-party evaluations.
  • Reflections and outlook: lessons learned during implementation, unresolved issues, and follow-up plans.
  • Scalability: an assessment of the submission's potential for adoption by other institutions, along with proposed pathways for dissemination.

2. Presentation Video

Each video should be 3-5 minutes in length and present the core innovation and implementation outcomes of the submission. Bilingual Chinese and English subtitles are preferred. Format: MP4, minimum resolution of 1080p.

Optional Materials:

Images, posters, instructional design documents, academic papers, system demonstration screenshots or screen recordings, user feedback, website links, and other supporting materials may be submitted.

Formatting Requirements and Copyright Notice:

All submitted materials must be authentic, accurate, and complete, and free of any intellectual property disputes. Bilingual submissions in Chinese and English are encouraged. The application form must be completed through the Competition's application system.

Intellectual property rights for the application form, videos, and all supporting materials remain with the submitting party. Submission of a case does not constitute a transfer of copyright. DI-IDEA reserves the right to display submitted works, compile them into collections, and organize academic publications based on them. Cases submitted to the DI-IDEA Hub for publication will be made available under an open-access CC-BY 4.0 license.

V. Competition Schedule

This track comprises three stages: submission, review and public announcement, and awards presentation.

  • Submission: April 28-August 31, 2026
  • Review and public announcement: September 1-October 31, 2026
  • Awards Ceremony: November 2026 (specific dates to be announced separately)

*All times mentioned in the above schedule are in Beijing Time (GMT+8). The Organizing Committee reserves the right to adjust the schedule if necessary.

VI. Award Settings
  • Gold Awards: Granted across all groups, with no more than four recipients in total. Each winner will receive a trophy, a certificate, and a prize of RMB 30,000.
  • Silver Awards: No more than two recipients per group. Each winner will receive a trophy, a certificate, and a prize of RMB 10,000.
  • Bronze Awards: No more than eight recipients per group. Each winner will receive a certificate and a prize of RMB 5,000.
  • Merit Awards: No more than ten recipients per group. Each winner will receive a certificate.

*Each recipient will be granted only the highest-level award attained, along with the corresponding prize. All prize amounts are stated in RMB before tax.

VII. Awards List

第三届全球数智教育创新大赛
AI for Teaching and Leanring 赛道获奖名单公示

大赛评审工作已全部结束,获奖名单现予以公示(详见下表)。公示时间为2026年10月26日至10月28日。

公示期内,任何单位或个人如对获奖结果存有异议,请以实名形式提交详细申诉材料至指定邮箱:aiforlearning@163.com,逾期或匿名反映恕不受理。

大赛组委会将对所反映情况进行核实,并依据结果处理。

一、AI教学创新实践案例

序号 负责人姓名 负责人院校 团队成员 案例名称 获奖情况
1 张鹏翼 北京大学 金帆 罗泽阳 唐震怡 张晨昱 AI智能体参与的小班讨论课教学探索 金奖
2 CHAN Chi Yu
陈祉羽
岭南大学 TransLab:构建人工智能赋能翻译学习与评估的闭环教学模式 银奖
3 马运峰 西安交通大学 孙丽娜 周晓勃 季延红 师生机三元协同的沉浸式医学免疫学课堂 银奖
4 白碧哲 复旦大学 岑晓帆 崔子钰 陈涛 灵课本 × 灵工坊:基于 Agent Harness 工程的生成式互动教材智能体 铜奖
5 熊文涛 北京大学 沈冰 缴拓梦 地球科学+:知识图谱与生成式AI驱动的跨学科智能教学实践 铜奖
6 张宝平 兰州大学 李瑞萍 李兆琼 张植栋 多模态大语言模型赋能口腔影像诊断推理的人机协同教学实践 铜奖
7 唐超颖 南京航空航天大学 姜斌 刘巧珏 王新华 以控制之道,启教学之智——AI赋能的自动控制原理教学创新实践 铜奖
8 王朝 西安电子科技大学 杜文鑫 范正欣 让身体成为可读的学习界面:大学瑜伽“教—学—练—评”闭环教学创新实践
——基于MediaPipe人体拓扑树与DLS逆运动学的VectorBody 2.0系统
铜奖
9 蒋玉龙 复旦大学 李娜 姚瑶 四维赋能,全景深融:AI驱动“半导体物理(H)”原位翻转课堂教学实践 铜奖
10 Yuyun Yang 岭南大学 Zhongxi Zhu Integrating Data Science Project with a Global Datathon and GAI-Enhanced Learning to Address Real-World Challenges 优胜奖
11 白康 华北电力大学 王旭光 陈文颖 王亚茹 梁玮轩 评价即学习:AI即时评价反馈激发工科生学习内驱力的双场景循证实践 优胜奖
12 Bui Ngo Huong Giang University of Transportation Ho Chi Minh City Bui Ngo Huong Giang, Dao Duc Khoi, Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, Nguyen Quynh Nhu, Nguyen Trung Hau SYNCHRONIZING AI WITH UNCONSCIOUS LEARNING 优胜奖
13 梁海映 北京大学 李淑静 马乃强 方晏 知识图谱与学习数据融合驱动的医学英语智慧课堂:AI支持的教—学—评一体化实践 优胜奖
14 欧田苗 中山大学 叶建涛 熊小峰 李卓明 鲁桂 “智绘药谱”:AI驱动的药学跨学科知识链条重构与拔尖人才培养创新实践 优胜奖
15 张宏岩 北京大学 张鹏 多AI智能体系统辅助研究生英语演讲的创新教学实践研究 优胜奖
16 Erick Purwanto 西交利物浦大学 Brennan Jones, Natasha Atmadja, Thomas Selig, Kok Hoe Wong MeshQ AI: Makes Learning Visible 优胜奖
17 Chu Mui Kim Singapore Institute of Technology Beyond the AI Tutor: A Differentiated AI Learning Ecosystem for Professional Judgement in Accounting Education 优胜奖
18 陈春花 北京大学 方璇 陶昶煜 刘怀存 程全成 张卫光 智慧课程赋能《人体解剖学》的教学实践与效果评估 优胜奖
19 吴燕 宁夏理工学院 王辉 四大图谱引领下《数据结构》AI赋能混合式全流程教学创新实践 优胜奖
20 Vo Thi Kim Anh Ton Duc Thang University Beyond Passive Code Copiers: Embedding “AI Auditing” and Role-Play Simulations into Agile Software Engineering and Advanced Database Education 优胜奖

二、AI教育智能体

序号 负责人姓名 负责人院校 团队成员 案例名称 获奖情况
1 王涛 西安交通大学 刘进军 罗肖 张莉 孙波 王渊 SmartPBL——赋能医学PBL的智能体矩阵的设计与应用 金奖
2 陈江平 武汉大学 张永军 桂志鹏 陈斯 肖锐 姚永祥 当遥感遇见茶香:跨学科AI智能体赋能乡村振兴的服务实践教学创新 银奖
3 赵毅 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) 包益欣 韦婷 杨振昕 赵鸣翔 师生共创教学智能体,自主构建育人新基座 ——大学数学公共课专属智能体 银奖
4 Rebecca Upsher King's College London Co-Creating AI-Enabled Learning Environments Through Student–Staff Partnership 铜奖
5 董志龙 西安交通大学 李淑彪 王莹 徐凤敏 金融科技研教助手 铜奖
6 Ngm Yujia Singapore Management University Rhithika S, Roy Ling, Anish Khanna ChatLearning: AI-Facilitated Collaborative Learning 铜奖
7 冯一凡 黑龙江大学 王雨桐 黄婴棋 潘钰虹 许瑞豪 闫鲲鹏 多语言术语系统科研辅助智能体 铜奖
8 梁东方 武汉大学 刘文娟 “隐于书山,问道求索”——隐山文献研究平台 优胜奖
9 Sazib Hossain 电子科技大学 Nakib Arman Mohammad SocraticAI: A Misconception-Aware and Pedagogically Adaptive AI Tutoring Agent for Personalized Mathematical Reasoning 优胜奖
10 司浩鸣 北京大学 陶枫林 吴再倩 郭佳诚 王艺霖 数学模型与大模型协同驱动的AI个性化教育平台 优胜奖
11 Duong Thi Thuy Van Ton Duc Thang University Vo Ngan Tho, Nguyen Thi Trieu, Nguyen Vu Gia Phuong, Huynh Thi Thuy Trang T-CORA:面向成果导向教育(OBE)培养方案审查的垂直领域大语言模型助手 优胜奖
12 Le Phuong Truong Lac Hong University Tran Diep Khanh Trinh, Nguyen Minh Thuy Tuong Thi Phuong Thao Khoa, Phan The Aanh, Nguyen Huu Nghi PlagCheck: A Text Similarity Detection System Supporting Academic Integrity. 优胜奖
13 Dexiang Gao 岭南大学 Jingyao Hu Heautor AI: A Customizable and Governable AI Tutor Platform for Institutional Learning 优胜奖
14 Akmarul Farhan Bin Abdul Razak University Malaya Akmarul Farhan Bin Abdul Razak, Arif fahmi bin adnan, Nur Jannah Binti Mardin, khairunnisa binti bujang, Nurul Hidayah binti mohd yusof ACTIVATE-ing Marketing Education: Integrating Generative AI Stacking and Gamified Pedagogy in Continuous Assessment for Diploma Accounting Students UMCCed, University Malaya. 优胜奖
15 鲍贝楠 浙江师范大学 张琼月 施贝宁 潘梦涵 赵禹涵 Memory Pal 趣味英语记忆伙伴 优胜奖
16 袁佩妍 中山大学 AI赋能《药事管理学》混合式课程教学创新实践 优胜奖
17 宋圣洁 北京大学 贺钰雯 王俊鑫 詹政德 姜宝帅 李聚金 墨韵书境——多智能体角色复刻赋能名著阅读与语文素养提升实践 优胜奖

三、AI赋能学习创新案例

序号 负责人姓名 负责人院校 团队成员 案例名称 获奖情况
1 胡名扬 武汉大学 李宇昕 陈境灼 罗梓宸 张博文 智感天穹:智能体实践学习新范式
——基于《生产实践(服务学习)》课程的茶田产教场景鄂港学生茶园采摘规划协同创新实践
金奖
2 Zhanat Makhataeva Institute of Smart Systems and Artificial Intelligence Vladimir Albrekht, Kulan Sagadi, Batyr Arystanbekov, Alar Akilbekov “AI-Enhanced 3D Manufacturing Lab”
An AI-Tutored, walkable 3D capture of a real engineering lab, built from a single phone video. Students can learn at their own pace from a browser.
银奖
3 王涵 承德医学院 侯子康 修林君 邢铭佳 罗宇 智医启悟——多智能体苏格拉底式临床思维重塑系统 银奖
4 蔡铭修 东北大学 咸浩洋 云析智研—多智能体驱动的智能科研辅助平台 铜奖
5 武于芮 大连科技学院 元晗旭 唐伊萱 李斯特 伯乐相码—基于AI人工智能技术的编程教辅系统 铜奖
6 李乐怡 西交利物浦大学 Hanjia Fang, Chenyu Du, Erick Purwanto, Brennan Jones Repairing Together: Evidence-Gated Reciprocal Repair for Human-Robot Collaboration in Learning 铜奖
7 戴昕 北京大学 杨诗若 周沛然 郭英帅 万曈舟 李馨玥 从使用AI到驾驭AI:法学生学习方式创新实践 优胜奖
8 黄珏 北京大学 张雨晗 王宇杰 闫天娇 刘凤麟 AI 生信能力四级跃迁:从可靠执行到自主发现 优胜奖
9 范元元 哈尔滨工业大学 赵宇星 邹佳希 马宁晞 杨若兮 陈琬纯 AI人机协同下二维动画全流程创新创作实践——以原创短片《食梦貘》为例 优胜奖
10 Sai Kyaw Htet Linn University of Information Technology Hsu Sandy Hnin, Khin Chan Myae Ko Ko, Phyu Sin Thant, Kaung Khant Ko CodeMentorX: Adaptive AI Tutor for IT Students with Web Resource Intelligence 优胜奖

四、AI赋能教师发展案例

序号 负责人姓名 负责人院校 团队成员 案例名称 获奖情况
1 蒋玉龙 复旦大学 方华 范慧慧 徐莎 曾勇 李娜 标准引领·系统支撑·诊断迭代·示范推广:AI全链路赋能教师教学发展的“复旦模式” 金奖
2 关伟豪 中山大学 李达亮 罗霖 陈川 周卉 黄致远 中山大学“逸仙智课”:AI赋能教师发展的四阶递进式人机协同实践 银奖
3 Erick Purwanto 西交利物浦大学 Yu Wang, Yexiang Wu, Youzhong Fan, Natasha Atmadja InQ2Plan: Human-Led Agentic AI for Ethical Teacher Inquiry 铜奖
4 Noor Akmal Shareela Binti Ismail Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Mohammad Nizam Mokhtar, Teh Rohaila Jamil, Mohamed Afiq Hidayat Zailani, Farah Dayana Zahedi, Ahmad Hathim Ahmad Azman From AI Users to AI-Enabled Educators: The Med-AI@UKM Faculty Development Ecosystem 铜奖

第三届全球数智教育创新大赛
AI for Teaching and Leanring 赛道组委会
2026年10月26日

VIII. Evaluation Criteria
  • Innovation: Whether the technological application or teaching/learning model demonstrates originality and novelty, and whether it offers new ideas or approaches worthy of broader adoption.
  • Effectiveness: Whether there is evidence of measurable improvement or empirical support, and whether the submission's value has been validated in authentic teaching/learning contexts.
  • Scalability: Whether the practice can be replicated and adopted across different institutions, disciplines, and cultural contexts.
  • Sustainability: Whether mechanisms have been established for long-term operation and continual iteration.
  • Compliance: Whether due attention has been paid to data security, ethical use of AI, and educational equity.
IX. Contact

Register Now

Email address: aiforlearning@163.com

Contact: Hong Huimin, 13849139155